Formation of ionic networks in molten salt mixtures. Computer experiment

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Molten salts are used as heat-conducting media in liquid salt reactors and solar installations. Knowledge of the thermal conductivity of molten salt is necessary for the safe operation of these units. Computational methods are an alternative way to the hard-to-reach experimental way of determining thermal conductivity. In this work, the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of the molten salt FLiNaK, as well as this molten salt with NdF3 dissolved in it, was calculated using the method of equilibrium molecular dynamics. The temperature trend of thermal conductivity, as well as its change after the dissolution of NdF3 in FLiNaK, is explained based on the determination of the dynamic network of ionic bonds that exists in the molten salt model. Networks of ionic bonds were established with an upper limit of interionic distance of 0.2 nm for both types of salt melts and with a limit of 0.27 nm for the Nd–F network in a melt containing NdF3. These networks of bonds appear in different parts of the system over time and may disappear completely. The total number of dynamic network nodes, determined during the correlation of heat flows, has an impact on the thermal conductivity value of the simulated system. A new method for interpreting the temperature behavior of the thermal conductivity of molten salt in a computer model can be used for predictive purposes when fluorides of various lanthanides and actinides are dissolved in salt melts.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

А. Galashev

Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science; Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: galashev@ihte.uran.ru
Ресей, Yekaterinburg; Yekaterinburg

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. C. Halliday, T.A. Hatton. Appl. Energy. 280, 116016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116016
  2. N. Sorbom, J. Ball, T.R. Palmer, F.J. Mangiarotti, J.M. Sierchio et al. Fusion Eng. Des. 100, 378 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.07.008
  3. M.A. M. Akanda, D. Shin. J. Ener. Storage. 60, 106608 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106608
  4. L.N. Ignatieva, V.A. Mashchenko, O.M. Gorbenko, V.M. Bouznik. Rus. J. Phys. Chem. B. 17(6), 1330 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123060039
  5. B.C. Froese. Adsorption of Neodymium Experiment Design to Simulate Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing. Syracuse: University Honors Program Capstone Projects, 2011, pp. 5–14. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/249
  6. Cervi, A. Lorenzi, A. Cammi, L. Luzzi. Chem. Eng. Sci. 193, 379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.09.025
  7. V.M.B. Nunes, M.J.V. Lourenco, F.J.V. Santos, C.A. Nieto de Castro. J. Chem. Eng. Data 48.(3), 446 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/je020160l
  8. A.E. Gheribi, P. Chartrand, J. Chem. Phys. 144(8), 084506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4942197
  9. A.E. Gheribi, J.A. Torres, P. Chartrand. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 126, 11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.03.028
  10. R. G. Ross, P. Andersson, B. Sundqvist, G. Backstrom. Rep. Prog. Phys. 47(10), 1347 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/47/10/002
  11. R.R. Romatoski, L.W. Hu. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 109(2–3), 635 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.036
  12. X.-H. An, J.-H. Cheng, H.-Q. Yin, L.-D. Xie, P. Zhang. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 90. 872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.042
  13. S. G. Robertson, R. Wiser, W. Yang, D. Kang, S. Choi, E. Baglietto, M.P. Short. J. Appl. Phys. 131(22), 225102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0088059
  14. Y. Nagasaka, N. Nakazawa, A. Nagashima. Int. J. Thermophys. 13(4), 555 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00501941
  15. G. Robertson, M.P. Short. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 064905 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0049727
  16. J.R.D. Copley, J.M. Rowe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 32(2), 49 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.49
  17. F. Demmel, S. Hosokawa, W.-C. Pilgrim. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 33(37), 375103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac101c
  18. Hosokawa, F. Demmel, W.-C. Pilgrim, M. Inui, S. Tsutsui, A.Q.R. Baron. Electrochem. 77(8), 608 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.77.608
  19. Bryk, I.M. Mryglod. J. Mol. Liquids. 120(1–3), 83 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2004.07.041
  20. Kshevetskii, Y.A. Kurdyaeva, N.M. Gavrilov. Rus. J. Phys. Chem. B. 17(5), 1228 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123050238
  21. M. P. Tosi, F. G. Fumi. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 25(1), 45 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(64)90160-x
  22. D.J. Adams, I.R. McDonald. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 7(16), 2761 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/7/16/009
  23. L. Pauling. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 51(4), 1010 (1929). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01379a006
  24. A.Y. Galashev, O.R. Rakhmanova, K.A. Abramova, K.P. Katin, M.M. Maslov et al. J. Phys. Chem. B. 127(5), 1197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06915
  25. J.E. Mayer, J. Chem. Phys. 1(4), 270 (1933). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1749283
  26. H. Wang. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Molten Salts: Force Field Evaluation and Development. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, 2022.
  27. Y. Ishii, K. Sato, M. Salanne, P. A. Madden, N. Ohtori. J. Phys. Chem. B. 118(12), 3385 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp411781n
  28. E.I. Rudenko, N.V. Dohlikova, A.K. Gatin, S.Y. Sarvadiy, M.V. Grishin. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 17(4), 845 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123040164
  29. B. Cordero, V. Gomes, A. Platero-Prats, M. Reves, J. Echeverria et al. Dalton Trans. 21(21), 2832 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1039/b801115j
  30. S. Thakur, C.J. Dionne, P. Karna, S.W. King, W. Lanford. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 094601 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.094601
  31. Rudenko, A. Redkin, E. Il’ina, S. Pershina et al. Materials. 15(16), 5603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165603
  32. I.L. Braun, S.W. King, A. Giri, J. Gaskins, M. Sato et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109(19), 191905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967309
  33. A.A. Voznyakovskii, A.P. Voznyakovskii, S.V. Kidalov, V.I. Zavarinsky. Rus. J. Phys. Chem. B. 15(3), 377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793121030325
  34. R.L. Xu, M.M. Rojo, S.M. Islam, A. Sood, B. Vareskic. et al. J. Appl. Phys. 126(18), 185105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5097172
  35. A.Y. Galashev. Appl. Sci. 13(2), 1085 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13021085
  36. A.S. Özen, Z. Akdeniz. J. Mol. Liquids 368. Part B, 20771 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120771
  37. J. Li, H. Guo, H. Zhang, T. Li. Y. Gong, Chem. Phys. Lett. 718, 63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.01.035
  38. Bessada, D. Zanghi, M. Salanne, A. Gil-Martin, M. Gibilaro et al. J. Mol. Liquids. 307(2), 112927 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112927

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. General view of the FLiNaK + 15 mol% NdF3 system before the MD calculation (t = 0 s, shown on the left) and at the end of the calculation when the melt was obtained at T = 1020 K (t = 2.5 ns, shown on the right).

Жүктеу (366KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Relative number of interconnected positive and negative ions in the FLiNaK + + 15 mol% NdF3 system forming Li+-F- bonds with lengths less than 0.2 nm (a) and Nd3+-F- bonds with lengths ≤0.27 (b); dashed lines and numbers near the curves show average values of the number of interconnected Nb ions.

Жүктеу (121KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Placement of Li+ ions in the system FLiNaK + + + 15 mol% NdF3 (800 K) at the end of the calculation.

Жүктеу (189KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Nodes of the largest bond mesh with bond lengths of 0.2 nm or less between positive and negative ions in the system FLiNaK + 15 mol% NdF3 at 800 K.

Жүктеу (128KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Placement of Nd3+ ions in the FLiNaK + + 15 mol% NdF3 system at the end of the calculation at 1020 K.

Жүктеу (136KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Nodes of the bond mesh between Nd3+ and F- ions in the FLiNaK + 15 mol% NdF3 system with bond lengths of 0.27 nm or less at the end of the calculation at 1020 K.

Жүктеу (67KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Temperature dependence of the relative number of bound ions for the systems FLiNaK and FLiNaK + 15 mol% NdF3; dashed lines - linear approximation of the presented dependences; in the figure the term “total number” means that the bond lengths Lb of all positive ions with F - not exceeding 0.2 nm, as well as Lb of dissolved ions with Nd3+-F bonds not exceeding 0.27 nm are taken into account.

Жүктеу (51KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 8. Thermal conductivity of the systems FLiNaK and FLiNaK + + + 15 mol% NdF3 determined in the molecular dynamic calculation (the present work) and in the experiment to determine the coefficient λ by the laser flash method [31].

Жүктеу (32KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025