Elastic properties of a magnetic elastomer

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Magnetoactive (aka magnetorheological) elastomer is a composite material consisting of an elastic matrix and magnetic filling substance. A study dedicated to the relationship between its viscoelastic parameters and the strength of the external magnetic field has been done. Under the influence of a field, the material can demonstrate elasticity and viscosity increased by ten folds. The elastic properties of the composite remaining under those conditions heavily depend on the degree of deformation of the sample. Thus, this type of magnetic composite is a prospective material for being used as the working body in controllable dampers.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

G. Stepanov

State Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology of Organoelement Compounds

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: gstepanov@mail.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 105118

P. Storozhenko

State Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology of Organoelement Compounds

Email: gstepanov@mail.ru
Ресей, Moscow, 105118

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Liao G.J., Gong X.L., Xuan S.H. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2012. V. 23. No. 1. P. 25.
  2. Liao G.J., Gong1 X.L., Kang C.J. et al. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2011. V. 20. Art. No. 075015.
  3. Hu G., Guo M., Li W. et al. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2011. V. 20. No.12. P. 1.
  4. Sun S.S., Chen Y., Yang J. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2014. V.23. No. 7. Art. No. 075009.
  5. Li W.H., Zhang X.Z., Du H. Advances in elastomers I: blends and interpenetrating networks. Berlin: Springer, 2013. P. 357.
  6. Ahamed R., Choi Seung-Bok, Ferdaus M.M. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2018. V. 29. No. 10. P. 2051.
  7. Sun S., Deng H., Yang J. et al. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2015. V. 26. No. 14. P. 1757.
  8. Kavlicoglu B., Wallis B., Sahin H., Liu Y. // Act. Pass. Smart Struct. Integr. Syst. 2011. V. 79. P. 770.
  9. Kim H.K., Kim H.S., Kim Y.-K. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2016. V. 26. No. 1. Art. No. 015016.
  10. Samir B., Kumbhara S.P., Chavana S.S., Gawad E.B. // Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018. V. 100. P. 208.
  11. https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers1/619.
  12. Du G., Huang X., Li Y. et al. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2017. V. 26. Art. No. 095024.
  13. Kim Y.-K., Koo J.-H., Kim K.-S., Kim S. // IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Beijing, 2011). P. 1.
  14. Fu J., Zheng X., Yu M. et al. // IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Wollongong, 2013). P. 1.
  15. Xu Z., Yang J., Gu Y. et al. // J. Guid. Control Dyn. 2016. V. 39. No. 3. P. 677.
  16. Yu G.-J., Wen X.-X., Du C.-B., Guo F. // Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019. P. 1.
  17. Boczkowska A., Awietjan S.F. // Mater. Sci. Forum. 2010. V. 636–637. Art. No. 766.
  18. Rigbi Z., Jilken L. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1983. V. 37. P. 267.
  19. Shiga T., Okada A., Kurauchi T. // J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995. V. 58. P. 787.
  20. Stewart W.M., Ginder J.M., Elie L.D. Method and apparatus for reducing brake shudder. US. Patent 5816587, 1998.
  21. Jolly M.R., Carlson J.D., Munoz B.C. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 1996. No. 7. P. 613.
  22. Jolly M.R., Carlson J.D., Munoz B.C. // Smart Mater. Struct. 1996. V. 5. P. 607.
  23. Demchuk S.A., Kuz’min V.A. // J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 2002. V. 75. No. 2. P. 396.
  24. Bellan C., Bossis G. // Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 2002. V. 16. No. 17–18. P. 2447.
  25. Zhou G.Y. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2003. V. 12. P. 139.
  26. Jolly M.R., Carlson J.D., Munoz B.C., Bullions T.A. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 1996. V. 7. P. 613.
  27. Zhou G.Y. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2004. V. 13. P. 1203.
  28. Coquelle E., Bossis G. // Adv. Science. 2005. V. 17. No. 1–2. P. 132.
  29. Gong X.L., Zhang X.Z., Zhang P.Q. // Polym. Test. 2005. V. 24. P. 669.
  30. Lerner A.A., Cunefare K.A. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2008. V. 19. No. 5. P. 551.
  31. Böse H. // Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 2007. V. 21. No. 28–29. P. 4790.
  32. Schrittesser B., Major Z., Filipcsei G. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009. V. 149. Art. No. 012096.
  33. Kchit N., Lancon P., Bossis G. // J. Physics D. 2009. V. 42. Art. No. 105505.
  34. Picken An H., Mendes S.J. // Soft Matter. 2010. V. 6. P. 4497.
  35. Hoang N., Zhang N., Du H. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2010. V. 20. Art. No. 015012.
  36. Yu M., Zhu M., Fu J., Yang P.A., Qi S. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2015. V. 24. No. 11. Art. No. 115021.
  37. Schubert G., Harrison P. // Polym. Test. 2015. V. 42. P. 122.
  38. Khairi M.H.A., Fatah A.Y.A., Mazlan S.A. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019. V. 20. No. 17. Art. No. 4085.
  39. Sebald G., Nakano M., Lallart M. et al. // Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017. V. 18. No. 1. P. 766.
  40. Winger J., Schümann M., Kupka A., Odenbach S. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019. V. 481. P. 176.
  41. Stepanov G.V., Borin D. Yu., Raikher Yu.L. et al. // J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 2008. V. 20. Art. No. 204121.
  42. Chertovich A.V., Stepanov G.V., Kramarenko E. Yu., Khokhlov A.R. // Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2010. V. 295. P. 336.
  43. Stepanov G.V., Borin D.Yu., Odenbach S. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009. V. 149. No. 1. Art. No. 012098.
  44. Stoll A., Mayer M., Monkman G.J., Shamonin M. // J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014. V. 131. No. 2. Art. No. 39793.
  45. Böse H., Röder R. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009. V. 149. Art. No. 012090.
  46. Molchanov V.S., Stepanov G.V., Vasiliev V.G. et al. // Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2014. V. 299. No. 9. P. 1116.
  47. Abramchuk S.S., Grishin D.A., Kramarenko E. Yu., Stepanov G.V. // Polym. Sci. Ser. A. 2006. V. 48. P. 138.
  48. Stepanov G.V., Abramchuk S.S., Grishin D.A. et al. // Polymer. 2007. V. 48. P. 488.
  49. Sorokin V.V., Stepanov G.V., Shamonin M. et al. // Polymer. 2015. V. 76. P. 191.
  50. Sorokin V.V., Stepanov G.V., Shamonin M. et al. // Smart Mater. Struct. 2017. V. 26. Art. No. 035019.
  51. Sorokin V.V., Ecker E., Stepanov G.V. et al. // Soft Matter. 2014. V. 10. P. 8765.
  52. Stepanov G.V., Borin D.Yu., Kramarenko E.Yu. et al. // Polymer Sci. Ser. A. 2014. V. 56. No. 5. P. 603.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Photograph of carbonyl iron (a) and permalloy (b).

Жүктеу (331KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the installation for measuring stress from deformation based on the tensile testing machine type I1158M-1-01-1, where: 1 – stepper motor; 2 – screw movement mechanism; 3 – movement sensor; 4 – load cell; 5 – sample holder; 6 – electromagnetic coil; 7 – measured sample; 8–11 – computer control system for the measurement process.

Жүктеу (170KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Dependence of stress in the sample on deformation: full hysteresis curve (a), enlarged part, quarter of the hysteresis curve (b), where: 1 – without magnetic field; 2–4 – in a magnetic field of 110 mT and different deformation rates: 2–5 mm/min; 3–20 mm/min, 4–50 mm/min. The arrows indicate the direction of deformation.

Жүктеу (284KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Dependence of Young's modulus of elasticity in a magnetic field on the magnitude of deformation at different deformation rates. Arrows show the direction of deformation change. Here: 1 – the magnetic field is 0; 2 – tension in a field of 110 mT at a rate of 5 mm/min; 3 – beginning of compression at a rate of 5 mm/min; 4–20 mm/min; 5–50 mm/min.

Жүктеу (153KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Dependence of stress in the sample on deformation for samples with permalloy filler with different concentrations: 1 – FeNi(70%) field 0 mT; 2 – FeNi(70%) field 110 mT; 3 – Fe(82%) field 110 mT; FeNi(82%) field 110 mT.

Жүктеу (125KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of the shear modulus on the magnitude of deformation at different magnetic fields.

Жүктеу (157KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Dependence of the shear modulus on the magnetic field at different strain values. Strain: 1 – 10%; 2 – 1%; 3 – 0.1%; 4 – 0.01%. A significant dependence of the shear modulus is observed with an increase in the magnetic field to 600 mT in the region of small strains.

Жүктеу (237KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024